NYT Reporter Kurt Eichenwald Was A Member/Administrator Of A Child Porn Site

Counter Punch- A New York Times reporter not only gave money to a child pornographer, but did business with him and even signed on to an illegal porn website as a member and administrator, documents unsealed yesterday in a federal criminal proceeding in Nashville reveal. He claims in one court document, he only “posed” as a pedophile.

The reporter is Kurt Eichenwald, who quit the Times in October, 2006. He already had a lot of explaining to do earlier this year about his conduct while working on the Justin Berry story when it was revealed in March that, without telling his editors, he gave $2,000 to Berry — an 18-year-old who’d spent five years making child porn of himself, when Eichenwald first contacted him in 2005. By then, Berry was an adult recruiting minors to perform sexually on webcams. After discovering this, Eichenwald found Berry a lawyer, who took him to the Department of Justice and got him immunity from prosecution in exchange for turning state’s evidence against four mostly gay and young men. All were eventually charged and convicted of making and distributing porn depicting underage teen boys. After Eichenwald wrote a blockbuster story about Berry for the Times, his journalism techniques aroused controversy in press circles. Even so, no one knew about the $2,000 check, and most of the media feted him.

Press adulation evaporated in March of this year however, when revelations of the $2,000 check emerged at a criminal trial in Michigan for one of the four accused men. Testifying there, Eichenwald said he was not acting as a reporter when he gave Berry the money, but was trying to save him from sexual exploitation and later demanded the money back before he started doing a Times piece.

This summer, a court hearing in the Nashville case revealed that Eichenwald gave yet more money to Berry, again without telling his editors. CounterPunch was the first to report this, and days later, the Times picked up the story. The Times didn’t say what the money — $1,184 — bought, and Eichenwald demurred that he had no independent recollection of having spent it. Two days after the Times report, he resigned from the Conde Nast financial magazine Portfolio without explanation.

I have tried reaching out to Kurt Eichenwald for his statement, but I have not received a reply. Also, I have been blocked by him on Twitter.

Continue at Counter Punch to see what recently uncovered court documents say.

Sal Traina

About Sal Traina

Sal is a married father of two living in liberal NJ as a Libertarian. Sal authored articles for various political and technology publications, e-newsletters, websites, & blogs. He is a seasoned radio vet with a decade of experience under his belt. As a member, and researcher for the Libertarian National Committee, Sal wishes to shine a light on the open border-loving and 2nd Amendment-hating establishment members who have hijacked the Libertarian Party. Email: sal@NewMediaCentral.net INTERESTS: -Political history, philosophy and libertarian politics -Talk radio and program management -Studying and exposing mainstream media propoganda, corporatism, and pop culture shaping by global elites -Writing about the decline of American culture, the complacency of the masses, and promoting personal responsibility

About the Author

Sal Traina
Sal is a married father of two living in liberal NJ as a Libertarian. Sal authored articles for various political and technology publications, e-newsletters, websites, & blogs. He is a seasoned radio vet with a decade of experience under his belt. As a member, and researcher for the Libertarian National Committee, Sal wishes to shine a light on the open border-loving and 2nd Amendment-hating establishment members who have hijacked the Libertarian Party. Email: sal@NewMediaCentral.net INTERESTS: -Political history, philosophy and libertarian politics -Talk radio and program management -Studying and exposing mainstream media propoganda, corporatism, and pop culture shaping by global elites -Writing about the decline of American culture, the complacency of the masses, and promoting personal responsibility